Additions:
More recently I have been comparing it to the Flex SDR-1000 in my shack. (For more info on the Flex see
Sdr1000Notes.) The Flex sounds better and has wider adjustable bandwidth, but the
ProIII does very well and taking the Pro to field is a lot easier. I probably would not take the Flex to Field Day, but I do take the
ProIII.
Deletions:
More recently I have been comparing it to the Flex SDR-1000 in my shack. (For more info on the Flex see
FlexSdr1000.) The Flex sounds better and has wider adjustable bandwidth, but the
ProIII does very well and taking the Pro to field is a lot easier. I probably would not take the Flex to Field Day, but I do take the
ProIII.
Additions:
More recently I have been comparing it to the Flex SDR-1000 in my shack. (For more info on the Flex see
FlexSdr1000.) The Flex sounds better and has wider adjustable bandwidth, but the
ProIII does very well and taking the Pro to field is a lot easier. I probably would not take the Flex to Field Day, but I do take the
ProIII.
Deletions:
More recently I have been comparing it to the Flex SDR-1000 in my shack. The Flex sounds better and has wider adjustable bandwidth, but the
ProIII does very well and taking the Pro to field is a lot easier. I probably would not take the Flex to Field Day, but I do take the
ProIII.
Additions:
More recently I have been comparing it to the Flex SDR-1000 in my shack. The Flex sounds better and has wider adjustable bandwidth, but the
ProIII does very well and taking the Pro to field is a lot easier. I probably would not take the Flex to Field Day, but I do take the
ProIII.
Additions:
Deletions:
Icom 756 Pro III HF Transceiver
High Performance HF Transceiver
{{image url="
http://www.rigpix.com/icom/ic756proiii.jpg∞"
Icom upgraded their already excellent 756 Pro II and came out with the
ProIII a few years ago. I decided to upgrade and have been enjoying the improved RF performance (hardly need Preamps now), and the 60 meter coverage.
References
AlanB
CategoryHamRadio