HamRadioWiki : RvLantenna

HomePage :: Categories :: Index :: Recent :: Comments :: Login/Register

Revision [1508]

Most recent edit made on 2007-02-03 14:07:56 by AlanB

Additions:
CategoryHamRadio CategoryRV


Deletions:
CategoryHamRadio




Revision [1430]

Edited on 2007-01-30 10:22:52 by AlanB

Additions:

RVLA = RV L Antenna



Deletions:

RV L 71 Antenna





Revision [1424]

Edited on 2007-01-27 08:10:07 by AlanB

Additions:



Deletions:





Revision [1423]

Edited on 2007-01-27 08:07:07 by AlanB

Additions:

RV L 71 Antenna

(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when that option is not available, this is a good choice).
80 Meter Tuner Version (redo these numbers for the longer length, these are for 32ft per side)
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction, especially on 40m. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band (and the AH-4 has no trouble).


Deletions:

RV L 72 Antenna

(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when that option is not available, this is a good second choice).
80 Meter Tuner Version (redo these numbers for longer length, these are for 32ft per side)
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction, especially on 40m. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.




Revision [1422]

Edited on 2007-01-25 23:05:08 by AlanB

Additions:

RV L 72 Antenna

In the process of my search I looked at a lot of alternatives and decided to look at "L" Antennas. This page is about the RV L Antenna that I constructed and tested at Quartzsite 2006 and 2007.
80 Meter Tuner Version (redo these numbers for longer length, these are for 32ft per side)
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction, especially on 40m. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.
Testing
Quartzsite 2007. AH-4 / FT897 / BetterRF adapter / 49AH AGM. Loads well on 75, 40, 20. Signal reports on 75m were good. No RFI problems from/to trailer so far. Would like to incorporate balun, perhaps 1:1 at tuner output. Build something designed for this app.


Deletions:

RV L 64 Antenna

In the process of my search I looked at a lot of alternatives and decided to look at "L" Antennas. This page is about the RV L Antenna that I constructed and tested at Quartzsite 2006.
80 Meter Tuner Version
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction, especially on 40m. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.




Revision [1365]

Edited on 2007-01-15 09:51:57 by AlanB

Additions:
80 Meter Tuner Version
80 Meter Coil Version
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction, especially on 40m. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.


Deletions:
80 Meters
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.




Revision [1364]

Edited on 2007-01-15 09:23:38 by AlanB

Additions:



Deletions:





Revision [1360]

Edited on 2007-01-14 15:38:43 by AlanB

Additions:



Deletions:





Revision [1146]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:53:02 by AlanB

Additions:
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction. It doesn't have much gain, but it has only one depression in the pattern. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though it is not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a bit of a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.


Deletions:
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction. It doesn't have much gain, but it has no holes either, at least on 80. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.




Revision [1145]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:36:19 by AlanB

Additions:
Conclusions
This antenna has a signal in just about every direction. It doesn't have much gain, but it has no holes either, at least on 80. It has both NVIS and DX potential, though not optimized for either. Matching it on 80 meters is a challenge, but it is a lot more efficient than a mobile antenna on this band.




Revision [1144]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:29:19 by AlanB

Additions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when that option is not available, this is a good second choice).


Deletions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when we cannot do that, this is a choice).




Revision [1143]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:26:53 by AlanB

Additions:





Revision [1142]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:14:34 by AlanB

Additions:

RV L 64 Antenna



Deletions:

RV L Antenna





Revision [1141]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:06:55 by AlanB

Additions:





Revision [1139]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:04:47 by AlanB

Additions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when we cannot do that, this is a choice).


Deletions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when we cannot do that, this is a choice).




Revision [1138]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:04:27 by AlanB

Additions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when we cannot do that, this is a choice).


Deletions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when we cannot do that, this is a choice).




Revision [1137]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:03:48 by AlanB

Additions:
(I really prefer to launch an FT98 Dipole into the trees with a Pneumatic Antenna Launcher, but when we cannot do that, this is a choice).




Revision [1136]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:01:59 by AlanB

Additions:



Deletions:





Revision [1135]

Edited on 2006-12-28 18:01:08 by AlanB

Additions:
In the process of my search I looked at a lot of alternatives and decided to look at "L" Antennas. This page is about the RV L Antenna that I constructed and tested at Quartzsite 2006.


Deletions:
In the process of my search I looked at a lot of alternatives and decided to look at "L" Antennas. This page is about the RV L Antenna.




Revision [1134]

The oldest known version of this page was edited on 2006-12-28 17:57:37 by AlanB

RV L Antenna


My Requirements for a good RV Antenna:

In the process of my search I looked at a lot of alternatives and decided to look at "L" Antennas. This page is about the RV L Antenna.

Configuration

Components

Calculations

80 Meters

AlanB, WB6ZQZ

CategoryHamRadio
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional :: Valid CSS :: Powered by WikkaWiki
Page was generated in 0.3476 seconds